This article explores criminal justice professionals' understandings and working definitions of the false allegation of rape.
There is a longstanding dispute between criminal justice professionals on the one hand and researchers and commentators on the other regarding the prevalence of false allegations of rape. Prevalence, however, is contingent upon definition. If the various protagonists' definitions of a 'false allegation' do not coincide, it is virtually inevitable that their estimates will diverge. Drawing on original empirical data from in-depth research interviews conducted with police and Crown Prosecutors, this article explores the following important but much-neglected question: When criminal justice professionals tell us that false allegations of rape are common, what precisely are they talking about? What 'counts' as a false allegation? (Published Abstract)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Understanding the Criminogenic Properties of Vacant Housing: A Mixed Methods Approach
- Supporting Implementation of Universal Prevention Initiatives in K-12 Schools: Impacts on Fidelity through Organizational Readiness and Team Functioning in a Cluster-Randomized Trial
- Understanding the Impact of Forensic Evidence on Homicide Clearance: An Analysis of Los Angeles Homicide Cases, 1990-2010