Overall, both probation officers and therapists were positive about their working relationships; they valued each others' roles and agreed that regular, accurate, and timely communication occurred frequently. Not all relationships, however, were effective. Several probation officers and therapists expressed dissatisfaction with poor communication, conflicts between the goals of therapy and probation, a lack of resources, and deficits in the policies they needed to adequately implement components of their supervision model (the containment model). These findings suggest ways to structure sexual offender supervision that integrate the distinct orientations of probation officers and therapists into a collaboration that promotes public safety and work well for all. (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Domestic Violence in the Lives of Children: The Future of Research, Intervention, and Social Policy
- Criminal Behavior and School Discipline in Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth With Autism
- Safety and Efficacy of Exposure-Based Risk Reduction Through Family Therapy for Co-Occurring Substance Use Problems and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms Among Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial