The authors are responding to a recent letter appearing in Forensic Science International: Genetics entitled “Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) internal validation of STRmix™ – A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11–24″, authored by Dennis McNevin, Kirsty Wright, Janet Chaseling, and Mark Barash [ [1] ] (hereafter MWCB).
In their letter they acknowledge that Bright et al. is a “valuable first step in establishing a foundational validity for mixture interpretation using probabilistic software, as recommended by the PCAST report” and suggest further experiments to “better address this issue”. 57 references (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- High-throughput LC-PDA Method for Determination of Δ9-THC and Related Cannabinoids in Cannabis Sativa
- OpenSense: An Open-World Sensing Framework for Incremental Learning and Dynamic Sensor Scheduling on Embedded Edge Devices
- Cardiac Genetic Test Yields and Genotype-phenotype Correlations from Large Cohort Investigated by Medical Examiner's Office