The authors are responding to a recent letter appearing in Forensic Science International: Genetics entitled “Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) internal validation of STRmix™ – A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11–24″, authored by Dennis McNevin, Kirsty Wright, Janet Chaseling, and Mark Barash [ [1] ] (hereafter MWCB).
In their letter they acknowledge that Bright et al. is a “valuable first step in establishing a foundational validity for mixture interpretation using probabilistic software, as recommended by the PCAST report” and suggest further experiments to “better address this issue”. 57 references (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- In-Field Collection and Preservation of Decomposing Human Tissues to Facilitate Rapid Purification and STR Typing
- Proteomic Analysis of Biological Fluids
- Analysis of Highly Degraded DNA from Bone Samples Using Probe Capture Enrichment of the Entire Mitochondrial Genome and Next Generation Sequencing