Since to date there has not been an adequate review of the methodological transparency of journal articles that include interviews with extremists, this study analyzed the content of 48 articles that involved such interviews.
The number of journal articles that rely on data derived from interviews with extremists has increased substantially over the past decade. This burgeoning invites the possibility that standardized reporting practices have not been explicitly clarified. The current study found that field-wide methodological transparency is lacking. Recommendations are presented for improving methodological transparency, with the implication that consensus on optimal reporting practices within the extremism literature should be reached soon. (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Factors that Facilitate and Hinder Implementation of a Problem Oriented Policing Intervention in Crime Hot Spots: Suggestions to Improve Implementation Based on a Field Experiment
- Risk and Rehabilitation: Supporting the Work of Probation Officers in the Community Reentry of Extremist Offenders
- Trauma Behind the Keyboard: Exploring Disparities in Child Sexual Abuse Material Exposure and Mental Health Factors among Police Investigators and Forensic Examiners – A Network Analysis