Building upon prior research, this study explored how interagency collaboration would potentially alter the role distinctions between police and probation officers, and how their common goals might be compromised or enhanced through partnership.
Study findings suggest that tension between organizational objectives threatens to create an imbalance of power between partnership participants (police and probation officers). As formal police-probation partnerships become more commonplace, the occasional incompatibility of police and probation functions becomes increasingly obvious. Understanding how police-probation partnerships create unique pressures on officers and ultimately reconciling the real or perceived incompatibility of police and probation objectives is an important prerequisite to partnership success. This study of a formally organized police-probation partnership in Spokane, WA provided an in-depth analysis of how police and probation officers viewed the strengths of partnership and the challenges posed to sharing their authority. Future research should analyze how the experiences and views shared by these officers participating in this innovative partnership would apply to similar collaborations elsewhere. Notes and references
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Testing the Invariance of Warrior and Guardian Orientations on the Prioritization of Procedural Justice: Do Officer Demographics Matter?
- Trauma Behind the Keyboard: Exploring Disparities in Child Sexual Abuse Material Exposure and Mental Health Factors among Police Investigators and Forensic Examiners – A Network Analysis
- The Mental Health of Officials who Regularly Examine Child Sexual Abuse Material: Strategies for Harm Mitigation