Since sexual assault case attrition research has been consistent in documenting that sexual assault complaints fall out of the system at disturbing rates, this article describes a pathway to attrition where managerial concerns incentivize case processing outcomes that remove cases early in the system and scaffolds a decision-making context where rape myth adherence provides sustained rationalizations for closing cases.
Using data on sexual assault incidents reported to the police, we present a quantitative analysis that investigates such a pathway to attrition that considers how police and prosecutors work together at the pre-arrest stage and the extent to which this practice facilitates the use of exceptional clearance police classification to close sexual assault investigations. (Publisher Abstract)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Assessing the Impact of Dade County's Felony Drug Court, Final Report
- Who's Right: Different Outcomes When Police and Scientists View the Same Set of Homicide Events, New York City, 1988 (From Drugs and Violence: Cause, Correlates, and Consequences, P 239-264, 1990, Mario De La Rosa, Elizabeth Y Lambert, Bernard Gropper, ed
- Patterns of Violent Crime: A Longitudinal Investigation