Restitution is most often ordered in cases of property crime but may also be used to reimburse violent crime victims for current and future expenses related to their physical and mental recovery and to make up for loss of support for homicide victim survivors. Other cases in which restitution is ordered include theft of services, fraud, forgery, and vehicle and traffic law violations. Restitution is not a punishment or an alternative to offender fines, sanctions, and interventions; rather, it is a debt owed to victims. Research studies indicate restitution is one of the most significant factors affecting victim satisfaction with the criminal justice system. Because restitution can be a complex process, models for implementing restitution statutes are presented and procedures are outlined for coordinating interagency restitution collection and automated restitution systems. Innovative approaches to collecting restitution are noted, such as the forfeiture of bond money, restitution collection in institutions, community restitution, and the use of private collection agencies. Recommendations to improve the restitution process are offered. 30 endnotes
Similar Publications
- Victim Cooperation in Intimate Partner Sexual Assault Cases: A Mixed Methods Examination
- Assessing the Impact of State Human Trafficking Legislation on Criminal Justice System Outcomes
- Remarks of James K Stewart to the American Society of Criminology on Taking Stock - Current Knowledge and Future Directions, San Diego, California, November 13, 1985