NCJ Number
305334
Journal
Review of Economics and Statistics Volume: 104 Issue: 4 Dated: July 2022 Pages: 819-827
Date Published
July 2022
Length
9 pages
Annotation
Since most criminal defendants cannot afford to hire an attorney to provide constitutionally mandated legal services, states commonly use either private court-appointed attorneys or a public defender organization; this paper investigates the relative efficacy of these two modes of indigent defense by comparing outcomes of codefendants assigned to different types of attorneys within the same case.
ABST
Abstract
Using data from San Francisco, I show that in multiple defendant cases, public defender assignment is plausibly as good as random. I find that public defenders reduce the probability of any prison sentence by 22% and the length of prison sentences by 10%. (Publisher abstract provided)
Date Published: July 1, 2022
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Teacher-Delivered Mental Health Interventions Promises, Challenges, and Recommendations for Future Directions
- Community Supervision Officers' Perceptions of Risk and Desistance Among Clients on Probation or Parole A Case Study in Georgia
- The Role of Perspective Taking and Self-Control in a Preventive Intervention Targeting Childhood Disruptive Behavior