The civil commitment programs of the 1960's include the California Civil Addict Program (CAP), the New York State Civil Commitment Program (CCP), and the Federal Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act (NARA). Of these, only the CAP was effective in reducing the demand for narcotics by heroin addicts; program participants reduced daily narcotics use and associated property crimes to levels three times lower than those reported by a comparable sample of addicts not in the program. The integrated dynamic system of social intervention for drug abuse outlined in this paper considers the level of addiction, the intervention strategies that are reasonable to apply to each level of addiction, and the movement of drug-using individuals through the levels of addiction. Several obstacles stand in the way of the successful implementation of this system: the current level of funding for drug treatment programs, the lack of outreach efforts to induce voluntary commitment by drug abusers, and problems posed by the criminal justice system. 3 tables, 3 figures, 4 notes, and 29 references.
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- Responding to Casual Drug Users: An Evaluation Report of the Maricopa County Demand Reduction Program Executive Summary
- Violence As Regulation and Social Control in the Distribution of Crack (From Drugs and Violence: Causes, Correlates, and Consequences, P 8-43, 1990, Mario De La Rosa, Elizabeth Y Lambert, Bernard Gropper, eds. -- See NCJ-128781)
- Assessment of Methods Used by State and Local Governments to Estimate Drug Abuse Levels: Summary