This study reports on the use of a multitrait-multimethod confirmatory factor analytic approach to analyzing callous-unemotional traits that are considered when diagnosing conduct disorders; the paper describes the analysis methodology, and notes that the predictive validity of the ICU was supported across demographic groups over a five-year period.
The Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits (ICU) is a widely used measure of callous-unemotional (CU) traits that may aid in the assessment of the diagnostic specifier “with limited prosocial emotions,” which has been added to diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder. Though there is substantial support for use of the ICU total score, the scale’s factor structure has been highly debated. Inconsistencies in past factor analyses may be largely attributed to failure to control for method variance due to item wording (i.e., half of the items being worded in the callous direction and half worded in the prosocial direction). Thus, the present study used a multitrait–multimethod confirmatory factor analytic approach that models both trait and method variance to test the factor structure of the ICU self-report in a clinically relevant, high-risk sample of justice-involved male adolescents (N = 1,216). When comparing the fit of empirical and theoretical models, goodness of fit indices (χ² = 1105.877, df = 190, root-mean-square error of approximation = .063, comparative fit index = .916, Tucker–Lewis index = .878, standardized root-mean-square residual = .051) provided support for a hierarchical four-factor model (i.e., one overarching callous-unemotional factor, four latent trait factors) when accounting for method variance (i.e., covarying positively worded items). This factor structure is consistent with the way the ICU was constructed and with criteria for the limited prosocial emotions specifier. In addition, measurement invariance of this factor structure across age, race, and ethnicity was supported, and the predictive validity of the ICU was supported across these demographic groups in predicting self-reported antisocial behavior and rearrests over a five-year period following an adolescent’s first arrest. (Published Abstract Provided
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Inequities in Mental Health Services: A 16-Year Longitudinal Study of Youth in the Justice System
- Psychological Safety Among K-12 Educators: Patterns Over Time, and Associations with Staff Well-being and Organizational Context
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Processing of Delinquency Cases, 2005-2022