NCJ Number
241320
Journal
Police Quarterly Volume: 11 Issue: 3 Dated: September 2008 Pages: 315-337
Date Published
September 2008
Length
23 pages
Annotation
This study examined the role of "working rules" that define what officers interpret as suspicious people, places, and situations.
Abstract
This study examines the role of "working rules" that define what officers interpret as suspicious people, places, and situations. Data were drawn from observational studies of police decisionmaking in Savannah, GA and Miami-Dade, FL. Current theory and research on the use of police discretion and biased policing is focused on the decision to stop, search, or arrest a suspect. Only a few studies focus on processes through which police determine behaviors to be suspicious that influence them to initiate official police action. An analysis of the "working rules" used by officers uncovered 12 substantive categories. The article concludes with a discussion of how this information can be useful in formulating training for police departments. Abstract published by arrangement with Sage Journals.
Date Published: September 1, 2008
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Exploring the Limits of Collaboration and the Fragility of its Outcomes: The Case of Community Policing
- How do Body-worn Cameras Affect the Amount and Makeup of Police-initiated Activities? A Randomized Controlled Trial in Milwaukee, Wisconsin
- Space-Time Association between Gunshot Detection Alerts, Calls for Service, and Police Enforcement in Chicago: Differences Across Citizen Race and Incident Type