The research described here had the goals of determining the effects of intensive supervision on recidivism as well as whether risk-based policies lead to better outcomes; the authors discuss their research methodology, outcomes, and implications.
In July 2018, the Minnesota Department of Corrections revised the criteria it uses to place soon-to-be-released prisoners on intensive supervision by shifting from mostly offense-based conditions to those based exclusively on risk. In doing so, this policy change provided a unique opportunity to evaluate not only the impact of intensive supervision on recidivism but also whether risk-based policies lead to better outcomes. Using Cox regression and negative binomial regression on a sample of 1,818 persons released in 2018, the authors found that intensive supervised release (ISR) significantly reduced the hazard for general, felony, and violent reoffending. They also found, however, that ISR significantly increased the risk of a technical violation revocation. The findings from the authors’ cost-benefit analysis showed that, despite the relatively high costs it incurred, ISR was a cost-effective intervention because it reduced reoffending for those with a higher risk of committing serious, violent crimes. Publisher Abstract Provided
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Are Schools Stricter at the Border? Investigating the Relationships Between School Strictness, Juvenile Justice, and the Border
- SAVRY Predictive Validity of Mississippi Justice-Involved Youth Recidivism: A Latent Variable Approach
- The Critical Case File Approach: A Novel Tool for Critically Analyzing Mixed-Method Data as Exemplified in a Juvenile Legal Setting