The results from each test indicate that all vendors satisfied the length scale specification as written in the ABFO No. 2 technical note; however, the measurements of internal and external circle diameters and center-to-center distance showed a lack of adherence to specifications. Still, the results for each vendor were consistent. The testing for perpendicularity of the two legs showed that more than half of the rulers tested were off from the ABFO No. 2 specification. In addition, there was inconsistency between rulers of the same vendor. The 4-year revisit found minimal changes in length scale, internal and external circle diameters, and center-to-center distance. Perpendicularity, on the other hand, exhibited significant change. Having a master rule with the marks within 0.1 mm of their nominal position is a reasonable requirement. There are also a number of accredited laboratories that can calibrate these master rules to the required accuracy. Plastic scales cannot be expected to hold this accuracy in actual use. A new standard could be used to better define the materials allowed for scales, criteria for the dimensions and legibility of markings, and optimizing targets for photography. 3 notes, 34 figures, and 7 tables
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Positive Identification Using Frontal Sinus Comparisons: Developing Empirically Based Guidelines
- Criticality of Spray Solvent Choice on the Performance of Next Generation, Spray-Based Ambient Mass Spectrometric Ionization Sources: A Case Study Based on Synthetic Cannabinoid Forensic Evidence
- The Social Foundations of Racial Inequalities in Arrest over the Life Course and in Changing Times