NCJ Number
165698
Date Published
July 1997
Length
115 pages
Publication Series
Annotation
This report examines developments in the community-mediation field over the past two decades and reviews the field's major achievements and ongoing challenges.
Abstract
The first chapter explores the history of community mediation programs, factors that influence their growth, the major types of programs in operation, and major trends in the field. This is followed by a chapter that examines the diversification of services provided by programs and a chapter that reviews resources for program design, support, and funding at the national, State, and local levels. These resources can provide assistance to policymakers and practitioners who are establishing or refining community dispute resolution programs. The next chapter addresses the impact of programs on the quality of justice and case processing efficiency, followed by a chapter that discusses critical issues that confront the community dispute resolution field, including professionalization, funding problems, turf conflicts, debates regarding the purposes of dispute resolution services, and related issues. The concluding chapter presents summary observations on the current status of the community mediation field. Major areas in which initial expectations for the field were exceeded and areas in which they were not are reviewed. The chapter then discusses possible measures that national, State, and local leaders can take to address challenges confronting the field. 8 exhibits and appended selected resource materials
Date Published: July 1, 1997
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Individual, Firearm, and Purchasing Characteristics Associated with Risk of Firearm-related Violent Crime Arrest: a Nested Case-control Study
- Examining Radicalization's Risk and Protective Factors: A Case-Control Study of Violent Extremists, Non-Violent Criminal Extremists, Non-offending Extremists & Regular Violent Offenders
- Psychological Safety Among K‐12 Educators: Patterns over Time, and Associations with Staff Well‐being and Organizational Context