The authors of this paper discuss the impacts of a family-systems model for engagement and retention of families and/or youth in treatment.
This study extends a program of research investigating the effectiveness of Brief Strategic Family Therapy to engage and retain families and/or youth in treatment. The study contrasted Brief Strategic Family Therapy (BSFT) with a Community Comparison (CC) condition selected to represent the common engagement and treatment practices of the community; 104 families were randomly assigned to BSFT or CC. Results indicate that families assigned to BSFT had significantly higher rates of engagement (81 percent compared to 61 percent) and retention (71 percent vs. 42 percent). BSFT was also more effective than CC in retaining more severe cases. Post hoc analyses of treatment effectiveness suggest that BSFT was able to achieve comparable treatment effects despite retaining more difficult cases. The authors discuss these results from a public health perspective, and highlight the study's contribution to a small but growing body of literature that suggests the benefits of a family-systems paradigm for engagement and retention in treatment. Publisher Abstract Provided
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Assessing the Relationship Between Treatment Quality, Matching and Dosage and Juvenile Justice Outcomes Among Youth With Co-Occurring Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders
- Treatment Needs and Gender Differences Among Clients Entering a Rural Drug Treatment Court with a Co-occurring Disorder
- Overview of the Innovative Family Treatment Drug Court Model in Kentucky