U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Training Correctional Volunteers for Group Discussions

NCJ Number
72278
Journal
Criminal Justice and Behavior Volume: 7 Issue: 3 Dated: (September 1980) Pages: 341-356
Author(s)
J S Wormith
Date Published
1980
Length
16 pages
Annotation
Various types of volunteer correctional counseling programs and their trraining components were assessed in terms of group process, participant evaluation, and outcome; results support the use of trained volunteers in systematic controlled activities.
Abstract
Sixty-three volunteers were assigned to 1 of 4 different institutional programs with 50 incarcerated correctional ofenders (trained discussion, untrained discussion, a self-control program and recreation activity) or a delayed-treatment control group. Volunteers were rated on interpersonal skills, and discussions were monitored. An attitude-personality test battery was administered in a prepost design. Participant evaluations were found to be a complex function of the amount and kind of volunteer, and the personality of the client. Trained discussion group volunteers self-reported more tension, and less flexibility than untrained volunteers, although the residents did not describe them as such. Volunteers in the self-control program reported more tension and less flexibility, approachability, and influence relative to the recreation volunteers. Residents rated the self-control volunteers higher in tension but also more approachable and more concrete. Residents expressed a greater appreciation of the noncriminally oriented volunteers. Training had a positive effect on the differential reinforcement of residents' pro- and antisocial statements. All program group volunteers increased on identification with criminal others as a function of their exposure to offenders. Recreation group volunteers also increased on empathy. Recommendations for additional research include a more systematic study of differential reinforcement of offenders' pro- and antisocial statements and a more intensive volunteer training program. Twenty-six references are provided. (Author abstract modified)

Downloads

No download available

Availability