U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Supreme Court, Capital Punishment and the Substantive Criminal Law: The Rise and Fall of Mandatory Capital Punishment

NCJ Number
108989
Journal
Arizona Law Review Volume: 28 Issue: 2 Dated: (1986) Pages: 143-257
Author(s)
J W Poulos
Date Published
1986
Length
115 pages
Annotation
A review of legislation on capital punishment in the United States focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Furman v. Georgia in 1972, the State legislation enacted in response to that decision, and legislation enacted following further Supreme Court decisions in 1976.
Abstract
At the time of Furman, 41 States still used capital punishment. Most gave the sentencing authority unfettered discretion to choose between death and a term of years. In Furman, the Court held that the imposition and carrying out of the death penalty constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the 8th and 14th amendments. Subsequently, 35 States enacted legislation seeking to reinstate capital punishment in a manner that would comply with Furman's requirements. The 1976 decisions invalidated the mandatory death penalty legislation, leading the affected States to enact new legislation patterned on the legislation upheld in the 1976 opinions. However, the court stopped short of saying that all mandatory death penalty statutes were unconstitutional in all circumstances. The new laws reduced the number of crimes punishable by death. The court decisions also show that imposing the death sentence will be considered cruel and unusual punishment unless society defines not only who should die for which acts, but also who should live despite those acts. 742 footnotes.