NCJ Number
194793
Journal
Punishment & Society Volume: 4 Issue: 2 Dated: April 2002 Pages: 147-163
Date Published
2002
Length
17 pages
Annotation
This article examines the evidence for the existence and impact of shaming on white-collar offenders with a focus on fraud and discusses whether what happens and/or is intended to happen is reintegrative shaming or exclusionary stigma.
Abstract
In reviewing the extent to which fraudulent behavior attracts shaming responses and the extent to which fraudsters are likely to care about the shame imposed on them, this article explored the use of shaming and stigma against white-collar criminals or financial criminals and evidence on their impact. Shame can unintentionally turn into stigma when some of those shamed are inappropriate targets. Shame is a subjective emotional state of significant complexity, where without social hypocrisy shaming would be reduced. This study examined the conditions or stages of successful shaming which included: (1) the application of shaming and its interpretation by significant others; (2) the offenders’ behavior must change in response; and (3) reintegration into society. The examination revealed that potential damage to business prospects was potentially more important then shame per se to the impact of informal sanctions. However, culture was seen as an important component of the process of shaming. Additional research was recommended to offer confidence in the effectiveness of shame aside from the difficulties of applying it in practice. References