NCJ Number
240039
Journal
Criminal Justice Studies Volume: 25 Issue: 2 Dated: June 2012 Pages: 159-175
Date Published
June 2012
Length
17 pages
Annotation
In this paper, the authors argue that the differential treatment of Black and White suspects, defendants, and offenders may result from the social and spatial mismatch, or separation, between both groups.
Abstract
The role of neighborhood influence and context is largely absent from the literature on risk and prediction. In this paper, the authors argue that the differential treatment of Black and White suspects, defendants, and offenders may result from the social and spatial mismatch, or separation, between both groups. This mismatch, in turn, has implications for attitudes towards members of both racial groups in the criminal justice system. Black neighborhoods are locked in a cycle of disadvantage in which certain structural characteristics - concentrated disadvantage, residential instability, high crime rates, racial/ethnic heterogeneity, and implicit racial biases - reciprocally influence each other. The authors propose a sociocognitive model that combines cognitive mechanisms of implicit racial bias (e.g. attitudes) and structural level (e.g. concentrated disadvantage) factors. The sociocognitive approach to risk prediction stresses the impact that personal beliefs and attitudes have on criminal justice actors' decisions about whom to arrest, prosecute, and imprison and thereby provides a framework for explaining why racial discrimination persists within an atmosphere that prides itself on being neutral and yet is often anything but. Finally, the authors offer recommendations for reducing racial prejudice and stereotypes, and minimizing their effects on judgments involving risk. Abstract published by arrangement with Taylor and Francis.