U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Race, Democracy and Law: Civilian Review of Police in Washington, DC (From Civilian Oversight of Policing: Governance, Democracy and Human Rights, P 41-61, 2000, Andrew Goldsmith and Colleen Lewis, eds. -- See NCJ-188271)

NCJ Number
188273
Author(s)
Cheryl Beattie; Ronald Weitzer
Date Published
2000
Length
21 pages
Annotation
This case study examined the history of civilian review of police in Washington, DC; the creation and operation of the Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB) during 1982-95; the reasons for its abolition; and the implications regarding civilian oversight of police.
Abstract
Information sources included newspapers and archival documents regarding the history of civilian review, together with official reports, observations of hearings, and interviews with board members, investigators, and police representatives regarding the 1982-95 period. Results revealed that concerns about racism and police brutality in the racially segregated and white-dominated city led to the establishment in 1948 of the Complaint Review Board. However, the Board had little power or status. Members resigned in 1973. Issues of group conflict clearly drove the history of this review board. Racial conflict was less evident in the history of the CCRB. A largely black government founded the CCRB to watch over a police agency that was nearly majority black in composition and that offered little opposition to the board’s creation. The police union certainly disliked the CCRB and did nothing to assist it. However, the CCRB design had the unintended consequence of placing CCRB actors in a position where they had to struggle with inherent tensions between formal law and democracy. The CCRB failed within the context of this structural problem because it was chronically unable to handle a large and growing caseload and because city officials came to regard the overworked board as cost-ineffective in the context of the city’s dire financial straits in the mid-1990’s. However, in 1998 the city counsel enacted legislation that created an Office of Citizen Complaint Review that consisted of volunteer citizens. The analysis concluded that conflicts among groups and fundamental tensions between democracy and law shaped civilian review. Footnotes, lists of government documents and newspapers, and 32 references