Participation and Flexibility in Informal Processes: Cautions From the Divorce Context

• NCJ Number: 108014
• Journal: Law and Society Review Volume: 21 Issue: 4 Dated: (1987) Pages: 585-604
• Author(s): H S Erlanger; E Chambliss; M S Melli
• Date Published: 1987
• Length: 20 pages
• Grant Number(s): SES-8024543
• Sponsoring Agency: University of Wisconsin-Madison; National Science Foundation
• Publication Format: Article
• Publication Type: Survey
• Language: English
• Country: United States of America

Annotation

Based on open-ended interviews with the parties and lawyers in 25 informally settled divorce cases, this study finds that the informal process is often contentious, adversarial, and beyond the perceived control of one or both parties.

Abstract

Although settlement in some cases reflects flexibility, party participation, and true agreement, in most cases it reflects unequal financial resources, procedural support, or emotional stamina. Parties report settling issues such as child support according to nonlegal, situational factors -particularly their relative impatience to finalize the divorce -- and mutual satisfaction with settlement terms is low. Our findings raise questions about the assumed value of informal settlement. However, we recognized that informal processing of divorce is structurally and institutionally inevitable (with or without evidence of its desirability), and we suggest that reform efforts must ultimately recognize both the inevitability and the limits of informal process. (Publisher abstract) ABI mtg