U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Overview of Sex Offender Community Notification Practices: Policy Implications and Promising Approaches

NCJ Number
187294
Date Published
1997
Length
8 pages
Annotation
This report summarizes up-to-date information on community notification practices for sex offenders and describes community notification procedures that promote sound public policy and practice.
Abstract
Community notification laws allow or mandate that law enforcement, criminal justice, or corrections agencies give citizens access to relevant information about certain convicted sex offenders living in their communities. As of October 1997, 47 States had passed community notification laws that require criminal justice agencies to inform local communities that convicted sex offenders are residing in their neighborhoods or allow the public access to this information. Proponents of community notification tout the following benefits: the right to know, public safety, increased surveillance and supervision, a treatment tool, and communication among community groups. In discussing how community notification works, the paper considers how and when communities are notified, the types of offenders about whom communities are notified, who is notified, the types of information communities receive, who notifies communities, and who monitors the offenders in the community. The jurisdictions that build community involvement into their notification practices apparently offer the greatest promise. Only one study has examined the impact of community notification on offender recidivism. In Washington State, researchers found that in a matched sample of 90 offenders subject to community notification and 90 offenders not subject to such notification, recidivists in the community notification group were rearrested sooner than recidivists in the non-notification group; the level of reoffending for members of each group after 4.5 years was the same. Most new arrests were for non-sexually motivated crimes. Implementation challenges for community notification are discussed. 20 references