U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Overcoming the Jurisdictional Divide: Compacts for Sharing Law Enforcement Intelligence and Resources

NCJ Number
216682
Date Published
June 2006
Length
7 pages
Annotation
This paper describes existing law enforcement agreements for preventing and responding to terrorist acts and considers ways to strengthen multijurisdictional efforts.
Abstract
Preventing and responding to domestic terrorist attacks requires that State and local law enforcement agencies collaborate across jurisdictional boundaries in ways unimagined 20 years ago. Sharing intelligence and investigating possible leads require that States and Federal law enforcement officials establish agreements and common systems for exchanging information. Currently, a wide range of new and revised compacts address various facets of public safety and criminal justice, including the transfer of prisoners, criminal history repositories, drug enforcement, drivers' safety and licenses, and civil defense and emergency management; however, collaboration among State and local law enforcement agencies will likely increase in importance as new security threats emerge, people become more mobile, and technology continues to blur jurisdictional lines. Policymakers and law enforcement officials should consider forming multijurisdictional regions through agreements. Regional efforts provide opportunities for State and local jurisdictions to do more with less. They should also examine the establishment of professional standards for terrorism prevention, as well as develop and share mutual aid procedures for law enforcement. Although interstate and intrastate mutual aid mechanisms currently exist, they lack resource-sharing procedures and plans for State and local law enforcement practitioners. Further, quantitative and qualitative methods should be used to evaluate the adequacy of new State laws and interjurisdictional agreements. 37 notes