Law enforcement and other experts assert that militia members are well-connected through computer networks, public forums, radio broadcasts, videos, and numerous publications. In addition, media and public focus on militias has increased following such high-profile incidents as Waco and Ruby Ridge. Many militias believe these incidents are precursors to further abuses of power against private citizens by an oppressive government and argue the right to own firearms is fundamental to freedom and the protection of constitutional rights. Opponents of militias, however, believe the right to own firearms does not extend to citizen militias. Further, critics of militias contend militia endorsement of violence justifies government efforts to suppress the groups. Critics also indicate racist sentiment among some militia groups poses a threat to minorities and call for strong measures to counter illegal militia activities, including increased Federal surveillance and the enforcement of State laws that prohibit unauthorized paramilitary training. At the same time, many observers caution against government overreaction to militias. Opposing viewpoints on citizen militias are presented in the context of constitutional freedoms versus authoritarian government, the achievement of goals by peaceful means versus violence, and the threat of militias to democracy. References and notes
Militia Movement
NCJ Number
169630
Editor(s)
C P Cozic
Date Published
1997
Length
96 pages
Annotation
The citizen militia movement has grown rapidly in the United States, with a total of 441 groups as of 1996, and the movement adheres to a variety of beliefs ranging from paranoid distrust of government to endorsement of white supremacy.
Abstract