Implications of Static-99 Field Reliability Findings for Score Use and Reporting

• NCJ Number: 237507
• Journal: Criminal Justice and Behavior Volume: 39 Issue: 1 Dated: January 2012 Pages: 42-58
• Author(s): Marcus T. Boccaccini; Daniel C. Murrie; Cynthia Mercado; Stephen Quesada; Samuel Hawes; Amanda K. Rice; Elizabeth L. Jeglic
• Date Published: January 2012
• Length: 17 pages
• Grant Number(s): 2007-IJ-CX-0037
• Sponsoring Agency: New Jersey Dept of Corrections; National Institute of Justice (NIJ); New Jersey Dept of Human Services; Texas Dept of Criminal Justice
• Publication Format: Article
• Publication Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
• Language: English
• Country: United States of America

Annotation

The authors of this study examined the Static-99 a well-researched measure used in many courtroom and correctional settings to help make decisions about sexual offenders.

Abstract

The Static-99 is a well-researched measure used in many courtroom and correctional settings to help make decisions about sexual offenders. But, as with most forensic assessment measures, much more is known about interrater agreement for the Static-99 in formal research studies than in routine forensic and correctional practice. This study describes "field reliability" for the Static-99 in two States that use the Static-99 for routine correctional procedures, Texas (N = 600) and New Jersey (N = 135). Rater agreement coefficients were strong for Static-99 total scores (intraclass correlations = .79 and .88), but the total scores assigned by pairs of evaluators differed for approximately 45 percent of offenders in each State. Because each individual Static-99 score has a unique interpretation, and a 1-point difference in a Static-99 score can have substantial practical implications for decisionmaking, these findings suggest the need for administration procedures or interpretation methods that acknowledge and account for measurement error in Static-99 total scores. (Published Abstract)