U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

"He's Guilty!": Investigator Bias in Judgements of Truth and Deception

NCJ Number
204460
Journal
Law and Human Behavior Volume: 26 Issue: 5 Dated: October 2002 Pages: 469-480
Author(s)
Christian A. Meissner; Saul M. Kassin
Date Published
October 2002
Length
12 pages
Annotation
This study tested the interview/interrogation performance of experienced police investigators compared to untrained and trained but inexperienced college students to determine correlations between experience, training, and various measures of performance.
Abstract
The study involved 44 North American law enforcement investigators (25 Florida police investigators and 19 investigators from Ontario, Canada) who were affiliated with local police departments. Twenty college students were untrained in interrogation procedures, and 20 other college students were trained in the interrogation techniques of Kassin and Fong. Participants were randomly assigned to view one of two videos, each depicting eight male suspects (four guilty and four innocent) repeatedly denying their involvement in a crime. After completing a brief background questionnaire, investigators were asked to decide whether each individual was lying or truthful regarding involvement in the crime at issue. As in Kassin and Fong's study, investigators were told that between one-fourth and three-fourths of the suspects were lying to protect themselves. In addition to making a truth/deception judgment regarding each suspect, investigators rated their confidence on a scale from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (extremely confident) and then described in their own words the basis for their judgment. A one-way analysis of variance was performed on each performance variable for the three-way contrast of "naive" students compared with trained students and experienced police investigators. The study found that a participant's higher level of training and experience apparently increased the likelihood that they would judge targets as deceitful rather than truthful. Overall, the investigators did not outperform the student participants in terms of either global accuracy or discrimination performance. The police investigators were also more confident in their judgments of deceit and truthfulness than were the student groups. These findings suggest that the pivotal decision investigators must make regarding whether to further interrogate a suspect under the assumption of the suspect's deceit may be based on prejudgments of guilt confidently made, but often in error. 2 tables and 42 references