U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Halt: The Alternative? The Effects of the Halt Arrangement Revisited

NCJ Number
218195
Author(s)
H.B. Ferwerda; I.M.G.G. van Leiden; N.A.M. Arts; A.R. Hauber
Date Published
2006
Length
219 pages
Annotation
This article reports on an evaluation of a juvenile diversion program in the Netherlands called the "Halt" program, which offers juveniles charged with a criminal offense the opportunity to avoid a criminal record by complying with a negotiated agreement designed to remedy the harms caused by their offense.
Abstract
The evaluation found that the juveniles who participated in the Halt program had the same reoffending pattern after 1 year as a control sample of juveniles who did not participate in the program. The seriousness and frequency of reoffending was similar for both groups. After 6 months, both groups showed fewer emotional, behavioral, relationship, and attention problems. The findings indicate, however, that juveniles with certain characteristics did have reduced reoffending related to program participation. These youth were first offenders who were aware of the consequences of their criminal behavior, had no or only mild emotional and behavioral problems, generally engaged in socially acceptable behavior, and were susceptible to group peer pressure. Positive effects from the program were greater for youth who completed a learning assignment or a punishment that involved a combination of community service and education. These findings suggest directions for modifying the Halt components and the selection for referral to the program of those juveniles most likely to benefit from it. The evaluation, which was conducted some 25 years after the first Halt Bureau was established, monitored almost 1,000 juveniles, half of whom were referred to Halt and half of whom received no intervention. The evaluation measured reoffending and attitudes before and at monitoring points. 55 references and appended questionnaire