U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Diagnosing Delinquents: The Purposes of a Youth Diagnostic Center

NCJ Number
125393
Journal
Juvenile and Family Court Journal Volume: 41 Issue: 2 Dated: (1990) Pages: 25-39
Author(s)
A R Lozano; G L Mays; L T Winfree Jr
Date Published
1990
Length
15 pages
Annotation
This study examined a juvenile training center in New Mexico whose main function is diagnosis, but which also serves as a short-term custody and treatment center. The research was designed to determine the characteristics of the youth committed to the Youth Diagnostic and Development Center (YDDC), the characteristics of youth likely to recidivate following commitment to the YDDC, and the differences in recidivism between youth who participate in post-dispositional treatment and those who do not.
Abstract
The data was collected on a sample of 371 youth and gathered from YDDC resident files, telephone interviews with each youth's probation officer, and telephone interviews with the youths themselves. The dependent variable in the study was recidivism, defined as rearrest within a follow-up period of 12 months. The test variable was treatment; seven independent variables were included. The findings indicate that more serious juvenile offenders were committed to the training school, exhibiting characteristics of serious delinquent offenders, although some were committed for status offenses. The results show that most youths who recidivate following commitment to YDDC do not possess the characteristics of more serious juvenile offenders, but are usually younger and misdemeanor offenders. On the contrary, longer institutionalization leads to reduced recidivism rates. Only completion of a treatment program following commitment and age were significant correlates of time to recidivism. Finally, according to the results, treatment intervention had only short-term effects in delaying or reducing recidivism. 12 tables, 32 references. (Author abstract modified)