U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Deadly Force - Psychosocial Factors and Objective Evaluation - A Preliminary Report (From Psychological Services for Law Enforcement, P 315-334, 1986, J Reese and H A Goldstein, eds. - See NCJ-104098)

NCJ Number
104117
Author(s)
T H Blau
Date Published
1986
Length
20 pages
Annotation
Following a review of the history, current issues, data, and standards associated with the police use of deadly force, this paper presents a form and procedures for collecting data pertinent to a predictive risk typology for the police use of deadly force.
Abstract
Historically, public concern about police abuse of authority has constrained the police use of deadly force. Current issues in this area pertain to the conditions and standards for police firearm use, firing at fleeing felons, racial bias in police shootings, constitutional rights of victims of police shootings, police training in the use of deadly force, civil versus criminal sanctions against officers who shoot citizens, and officer stress as a factor in police shootings. Current figures on police shootings cover the percentage of off-duty officers involved in shootings, the percentage of police shootings that are fatal, the percentage of police shootings associated with various offense types, victim characteristics, and various factors associated with police shootings. Also considered are statistical and research design issues in measuring police-inflicted homicides. The paper lists policy for the use of deadly force by most police agencies, the FBI, and grand jury dispositions. The evaluation form for collecting data pertinent to a predictive risk typology for police shootings covers variables related to officers, department/administration, community and neighborhood, incident circumstances, and the victim. Examples of the application of the evaluation scale are provided, and requirements for additional research on the scale are listed. A scale form, sample calculations, and 13 references.