U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Communication Codes Among African American Children and Youth: The Fast Track From Special Education to Prison?

NCJ Number
201269
Journal
Journal of Correctional Education Volume: 54 Issue: 2 Dated: June 2003 Pages: 45-52
Author(s)
Gary H. Sherwin Ph.D.; Stacy Schmidt Ed.D.
Date Published
June 2003
Length
8 pages
Annotation
This study examined culturally intact communication codes that could influence the over-identification of African-American males in special education and, ultimately, correctional facilities.
Abstract
The research focused on variations in aggressiveness between ethnic groups among participants in two Kid Clubs (Havenhearst and Santa Fe) in a Southern California community. The mission of Kid Clubs is to promote and reinforce the attributes of self-esteem and self-assurance while providing children with fundamental leadership experiences and skill-development opportunities. Data were collected by using extended observations as well as focused and unstructured interviews with informants and interactants. A total of 53 site visits were conducted at Havenhearst and 44 site visits at Santa Fe. Field notes and a daily diary were kept for each site visit. More than 400 aggression operations were observed and recorded at Santa Fe and Havenhearst. Although each aggressive operation was singular, certain types of aggressive behavior apparently clustered based on meaning, action, and operation. An important setting variation between Havenhearst and Santa Fe was the dearth of verbally aggressive greeting operations observed at Santa Fe. African-American males consistently greeted one another with aggression referred to as mock-battle greeting posturing; for example, a male African-American participant meeting a peer might face the other in close proximity, pull away, and take a fighting stance, and then utter a combative challenge. The challenged male would strike at the air near the "aggressor's" face while the other returned the mock blows; then they shook hands or embraced and proceeded to an activity together. The greeting posturing observed among Latino and Euro-American males did not include ritualistic mock-battle posturing greetings. Data from this study thus show that staff members and youthful participants promote activities and a culture in which aggressiveness served a prosocial communication function through negotiated meanings. Verbally aggressive greetings and ritualistic mock-battle greeting aggressiveness among males can be viewed as discrete cultural communication codes among the African-American participants. Although these greeting rituals are not understood by the participants as an intent to harm, the operation can easily be misunderstood by others. Service providers should be aware of unique communication styles in the communities where they work and the potential effects of communicative codes, so as to avoid miscommunication. Implications are drawn for future research. 1 figure and 41 references