Changes in the Judicial Processing Patterns of Male and Female Criminal Defendants

• NCJ Number: 87142
• Author(s): C A Kempinen
• Date Published: 1982
• Length: 234 pages
• Sale Source: UMI Dissertation Services
• Publication Type: Thesis/Dissertation
• Language: English
• Country: United States of America
• Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS. Pennsylvania State University - doctoral thesis

Annotation

This research explores whether men and women receive different treatment in the criminal court, focusing on three decisionmaking points in the judicial process: the decision to dismiss or further process, the decision to find the defendant guilty or not guilty, and the type of sentence handed down.

Abstract

Data contain information on all persons processed through the Pennsylvania Courts of Common Pleas from 1970-75. Findings indicate that overall, women received more lenient treatment than men regarding the sentencing decision only. Women received significantly less severe treatment for personal (e.g. murder, assault) and serious property crimes. Furthermore, the leniency extended to women was greatest among defendants who were black, young, and living in either urban or rural areas (compared to suburban areas or small cities). Evidence suggests that the disparities in the treatment of men and women are diminishing, particularly regarding more serious crimes. About 70 references, study data, and footnotes are supplied. (Author abstract modified)