U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

CAPITAL MURDER FROM BENEFIT OF CLERGY TO BIFURCATED TRIALS: NARROWING THE CLASS OF OFFENSES PUNISHABLE BY DEATH

NCJ Number
143609
Journal
Criminal Law Bulletin Volume: 29 Issue: 4 Dated: (July-August 1993) Pages: 291-316
Author(s)
J R Acker; C S Lanier
Date Published
1993
Length
26 pages
Annotation
The elements of capital murder are examined with respect to how that crime is defined by different State and Federal laws.
Abstract
These laws narrow the class of offenders that may be punished by capital punishment. Both the elements of the crime of murder, which must be proven at the guilt phase of the trial, and sentencing factors, which must be proven at the penalty trial, serve to perform this narrowing function. Substantive differences exist in the definitions of capital murder, thereby affecting death penalty procedures. Death penalty schemes typically require that following a conviction for murder, proof be made of one or more statutory aggravating circumstances at the sentencing phase of the trial. The legislation also includes procedural safeguards to avoid error and the potential for arbitrary sentencing. These may include grand jury review of murder indictments, the death-qualification of potential jurors, and proof beyond a reasonable doubt of crime-related aggravating factors. Greater procedural protections typically are associated with guilt-phase narrowing statutes than with sentencing-phase narrowing statutes. The second part of this two-part article will focus on the substance of capital murder and review several issues related to it. Footnotes

Downloads

No download available