U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Assessing Effectiveness of Drug Abuse Prevention: Implementation Issues Relevant to Long-Term Effects and Replication (From Drug Abuse Prevention Intervention Research: Methodological Issues, P 195-212, 1991, Carl G. Leukefeld and William J. Bukoski, eds. - see NCJ-140135)

NCJ Number
140146
Author(s)
J D Hawkins; R Abbott; R F Catalano; M R Gillmore
Date Published
1991
Length
18 pages
Annotation
There is not yet enough evidence to determine whether drug prevention intervention actually prevent drug abuse, at least according to the American Psychiatric Association definition of drug abuse. A strategy for assessing the long- term effects of drug abuse prevention interventions in replicable studies is outlined.
Abstract
The first step is improving the possibility of replication and assessment of the long-term effects of drug prevention programs is specifying the intervention theory. The theory must identify the basis for the intervention and the target population; suggest short- and long-term outcomes; and describe the linkages among these three variables. Many methods of collecting data on the degree of implementation have been employed. Ideally, several measurement methods assessing multiple indicators should be included to provide a comprehensive evaluation. When reporting on implementation data, researchers should systematically assess personality characteristics, situational variables, and the political context of the intervention. Selection of the appropriate implementation indicators used to judge the degree of operationalization of the theoretical construct should be based on the theoretical foundation of an intervention. The authors illustrate six structural equation models which incorporate data on intervention implementation into the analysis of the relationship between the intervention and outcomes. 6 figures and 22 references