U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Arrest Outcomes Associated With Outpatient Commitment in New York State

NCJ Number
306909
Journal
Psychiatric Services Volume: 62 Issue: 5 Dated: 2011 Pages: 504-08
Author(s)
Bruce G. Link; Matthew W. Epperson; Brian E. Perron; Dorothy M. Castille; Lawrence H. Yang
Date Published
2011
Length
5 pages
Annotation

This paper presents a quasi-experimental study that included individuals at high risk for violence and observed them over several years, in order to better understand the effects of assisted outpatient treatment on recidivism.

Abstract

This study examined whether assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) under New York's “Kendra's Law” is associated with reduced arrests for violent and nonviolent offenses. Arrest records of 183 study participants attending outpatient clinics in New York City, 86 of which had been, and 97 were never assigned to AOT, were compiled to yield 16,890 months of observation. For each month, the data indicated whether an arrest did or did not occur and whether a participant was or was not assigned to AOT. Generalized estimating equations and fixed-effects analyses were used to compare arrest rates within different periods (before, during or shortly after, and more than six months after) for those ever assigned and between the ever- and never-assigned groups. For those who received AOT, the odds of any arrest were 2.66 times greater and the odds of arrest for a violent offense 8.61 times greater before AOT than they were in the period during and shortly after AOT. The group never receiving AOT had nearly double the odds of arrest compared with the AOT group in the period during and shortly after assignment. Outpatient commitment under Kendra's Law in New York State is associated with a reduced risk of arrest. The coercion necessitated by application of the law may forestall, at least for some people, the potentially more potent and consequential coercion they would have experienced in the criminal justice system. Publisher Abstract Provided