The study found that family and school factors were important predictors of bystander intervention, with higher family management and more positive school climate associated with greater likelihood of intervention and higher feelings of social exclusion and teacher and peer discrimination associated with inactive responses to aggression and retaliation. The study concluded that a complex group of factors related to the likelihood of intervening when someone is being victimized or considering retaliation in response to victimization. These results provide guidance and new directions for possible school- and family-based interventions to encourage bystander intervention in instances of aggression. Participants in the study included 6th and 9th graders (N = 896, 52.8 percent female), who assessed how likely they would be to intervene if they observed aggression and when they heard the victim was planning to retaliate. (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Reassessing the Breadth of the Protective Benefit of Immigrant Neighborhoods: A Multilevel Analysis of Violence Risk by Race, Ethnicity, and Labor Market Stratification
- Using the Moral-Situational-Action Model of Extremist Violence (MSA-EV) to Assess Fluctuating Levels of Risk in Women: The Relevance of Risk, Promotive, and Protective Factors
- Measuring Image-Based Sexual Abuse (IBSA): Psychometric Validation and Analysis of the IBSA Scale