The study found that TARGET had fewer dropouts than PE (i.e., 29 percent vs. 64 percent). At post test, improvements were found for both interventions in increased emotion regulation and hope, and reduced PTSD symptoms, hostility, experiential avoidance, and mental health problems. At a 4 month follow up, comparable proportions (approximately 40 percent) of recipients in each therapy maintained clinically significant gains. Self rated expectancy of therapeutic outcome and working alliance was comparable for both PE and TARGET early in therapy, at mid treatment, and at the end of treatment. Although preliminary, these results suggest that TARGET may be a viable therapeutic option for male military veterans with PTSD and anger problems. (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Broadband Capacitively Fed Tapered Type PIFA With Modified Ground Plane
- Men Do Matter: Ethnographic Insights on the Socially Supportive Role of the African American Uncle in the Lives of Inner-City African American Male Youth
- Insights into turning points from the perspective of young people with out-of-home care experience: events, impact and facilitators of change