This study examined survey data from two U.S. police departments to assess the validity of the Warrior/Guardian framework for policing.
Policing experts have suggested that shifting from a warrior mindset - officers viewing themselves as warriors fighting crime - to a guardian mindset - officers valuing working with the public to reduce crime - is a valuable method for improving police-community relations across the United States; however, little empirical evidence has been used to inform this debate. In addressing this research gap, the current study used factor analyses in determining that the warrior and guardian mindsets are distinct, but related concepts. Furthermore, these mindsets are associated with different attitudinal outcomes (e.g. the guardian mindset was associated with greater prioritization of communication during citizen encounters). Thus, the Warrior/Guardian framework is supported empirically. Overlap between the Warrior/Guardian framework and existing police culture literature is discussed, and police culture is offered as a potential explanation for variation in warrior and guardian orientations. (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- "A Rape Is a Rape, Regardless of What the Victim Was Doing at the Time": Detective Views on How "Problematic" Victims Affect Sexual Assault Case Processing
- Cumulative Bullying Experiences, Adolescent Behavioral and Mental Health, and Academic Achievement: An Integrative Model of Perpetration, Victimization, and Bystander Behavior
- Gender Differences in the Associations Among Sexual Abuse, Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms, and Delinquent Behaviors in a Sample of Detained Adolescents