The report focus is on the implementation of the guidelines as the courts dealt with progressing from the abstract to the practical questions of innovating a new approach and the evaluation of the initial use of these guidelines if implementation occurred. In each of the jurisdictions, the guidelines process included descriptive research, problem identification, and the development of decision guidelines. Large samples of recent bail decisions were collected to be representative of the decisionmaking of five courts in the three sites. The guidelines process proceeded to implement the guidelines in Maricopa County Superior Court and in Dade County Circuit Court but not in the Boston Municipal Court. This report examines the experience with the guidelines process of these three court systems and the evaluation research conducted in two systems. Report conclusions address the strengths and weaknesses of the guidelines experience and identify ways the bail/pretrial release guidelines can be made to work effectively. 8 tables, 5 references, 2 appendixes.
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Program Evaluation: How Do We Know If We Are Preventing Gang Membership?
- Reinventing Evaluation to Build High-Performance Child and Family Interventions
- We Need to Not Fear You: Essential Factors Identified by Sworn Officers and Civilian Staff for Implementation and Expansion of a Co-Response Program