Research concerning these reforms has concentrated on their immediate goal of reducing sentence disparity. The current research was conducted to evaluate the impact of sentencing reforms on prisons and crime rates. A pooled time series-cross section design was used that incorporated data for each State during the 1970's and 1980's. It was found that, in most instances, sentencing reforms had little impact on the prison population, the number of prison admissions, or prison terms. A few laws, however, were followed by significant changes, especially reduced prison population growth in sentencing guideline States (Florida, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington). Even less evidence was found to show that sentencing reforms affected crime rates, and there was little indication that sentencing laws had a significant deterrent impact. The authors conclude that differences between sentencing laws and their settings differ from State to State and that the impact of sentencing reforms varies greatly. 44 references and 9 tables
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- Population-level Effects on Crime of Recovering Firearms from Armed Prohibited Persons: Intention-to-treat Analysis of a Pragmatic Cluster-randomised Trial in California Cities
- Concentrated Disadvantage and Stress in Daily Life after Prison
- Prison Personnel Solutions for Reducing and Improving the Appropriate Use and Effectiveness of Extended Restrictive Housing