In a discussion, panelists note that incarceration rates have dropped markedly since the program's inception in 1984. Public support of the program has been good because offenders pay restitution, pay the State to offset the cost of supervision, and work to support dependents and families. Also discussed are concerns that such programs require probation officers to act more like police officers, the potential for de-emphasizing rehabilitation, and the possibility that house arrest may result in net-broadening.
Watch
Similar Publications
- In the wake of Miller and Montgomery: A national view of people sentenced to juvenile life without parole
- Arrests Among Extreme Risk Protection Order Respondents in Washington State: A Statewide Retrospective Cohort Study
- Self-reported offending and drug use after prison release: The pernicious role of stress during reentry