Archival Notice
This is an archive page that is no longer being updated. It may contain outdated information and links may no longer function as originally intended.
Since youth victimization and aggression are common in adolescents’ daily lives, this study examined relations between youth cognition and reasoning related to bullying and possible responses to bullying, peer nominations related to youth roles in the bullying ecology, and self-report experiences of perceived racial discrimination, using latent class analyses.
Participants included 6th (n = 423) and 9th (n = 392) grade adolescents in the United States (49.1 percent female). Five distinct classes emerged: Typical, Uninvolved, Challengers, Experiences Discrimination, and Experiences Discrimination and Involved. Participants in these classes expressed their views on the acceptability of youth aggression and their likelihood of various responses to youth aggression. Findings indicate that the Challengers class was most likely to judge the aggression as wrong and the least likely to indicate that they would not respond if they observed aggression. Furthermore, both classes of youth who reported experiencing discrimination judged the aggression as more acceptable. (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Mapping Case Management Activities to Support Implementation and Fidelity of a Pediatric Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Program
- Race and Ethnic Differences in Mental Health Need and Services Received in Justice-Involved Youth
- The Prospective Impact of Perceived Social Support Profiles on Mental Health for Justice-Involved Youth