This paper examines the responses of judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys in six major urban jurisdictions to a set of hypothetical cases in which evidence of the victim's past sexual conduct is at issue. The different kinds of sexual history evidence evoke different responses from officials, and the specific provisions of the six rape shield statutes also affect officials' judgments. 4 notes, 1 figure, 3 tables, 1 appendix, and 37 references (Publisher's abstract)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Federal Role in Revitalizing Communities and Preventing and Controlling Crime and Violence
- Raman spectroscopic signature of vaginal fluid and its potential application in forensic body fluid identification
- Evaluating a Multi-Disciplinary Response to Domestic Violence: The DVERT Program in Colorado Springs